aloneindarknes7 (
aloneindarknes7) wrote2011-02-04 04:39 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Writer's Block: Connecting the dots
[Error: unknown template qotd]
As a future teacher, let me just give my brief opinion on this; NO, NO, NO, BAD, STOP DOING THAT.
Since that's pretty much what every single teacher pounds into my head.
As a future teacher, let me just give my brief opinion on this; NO, NO, NO, BAD, STOP DOING THAT.
Since that's pretty much what every single teacher pounds into my head.
no subject
no subject
The dictionary definition is a test that is administered and scored in a consistent, or "standard", manner. Standardized tests are designed in such a way that the questions, conditions for administering, scoring procedures, and interpretations are consistent and are administered and scored in a predetermined, standard manner.
But they're actually really unfair because they test specific things which may not be relevant to certain curriculums and they also are used with every student, meaning the student with special needs is expected to know and score as well as the regular student as with the advanced student and all that. It's really just terrible and forces school to stop being fun and more about learning the objectives that will be on these standardized tests.
no subject
(But, you know, only because something is foreign to you, doesn't necessarily mean it isn't to me. ;))
no subject
(I just meant that they're used all over the world in any system that has a well set-up education program so I was guessing they were used in Sweden too.)
no subject
NO, NO, NO, BAD, STOP DOING THAT.
My thoughts exactly. *g*
no subject
no subject
(Honestly, I did about the same on both tests if I like the subject. If I didn't like the subject though, GIVE ME MULTIPLE CHOICE. Often could get 10 points difference between the two. Which can be a LOT.)
no subject
no subject
ME
no subject